DEV Community

#packaging

The design of product packaging and physical presentation

Posts

đź‘‹ Sign in for the ability to sort posts by relevant, latest, or top.
Packaging and Distributing GUI Applications on Linux: Best Practices and Solutions

Packaging and Distributing GUI Applications on Linux: Best Practices and Solutions

Comments
12 min read
I pre-registered 28 guesses that popular PyPI packages have cleaner metadata. Only 9 held. Open dataset.

I pre-registered 28 guesses that popular PyPI packages have cleaner metadata. Only 9 held. Open dataset.

Comments
3 min read
PyPI: 72% of popular packages' dependency lines are optional extras, yet they carry fewer required deps than the long tail

PyPI: 72% of popular packages' dependency lines are optional extras, yet they carry fewer required deps than the long tail

Comments
4 min read
PyPI naming hygiene reversed: popular packages write dependency names more canonically than the long tail (4.8% vs 5.9%)

PyPI naming hygiene reversed: popular packages write dependency names more canonically than the long tail (4.8% vs 5.9%)

Comments
4 min read
Replicating a PyPI dependency-pinning number: the published 29% exact-pin share drops to 9-17% on fresh latest-release data

Replicating a PyPI dependency-pinning number: the published 29% exact-pin share drops to 9-17% on fresh latest-release data

Comments
5 min read
PyPI environment markers: popular packages gate deps on python_version and platform 5.6x more than the long tail (30% vs 5%)

PyPI environment markers: popular packages gate deps on python_version and platform 5.6x more than the long tail (30% vs 5%)

Comments
4 min read
PyPI keyword strings: popular packages use commas and phrases more, yet the long tail is more parse-ambiguous (41% vs 38%)

PyPI keyword strings: popular packages use commas and phrases more, yet the long tail is more parse-ambiguous (41% vs 38%)

Comments
4 min read
Popular PyPI packages declare keywords more often (49% vs 38%) but list fewer of them (median 4 vs 5)

Popular PyPI packages declare keywords more often (49% vs 38%) but list fewer of them (median 4 vs 5)

Comments
4 min read
Do popular PyPI packages declare themselves typed more? Yes, 1.8x — but the 'Typing :: Typed' label undercounts real typing

Do popular PyPI packages declare themselves typed more? Yes, 1.8x — but the 'Typing :: Typed' label undercounts real typing

Comments
3 min read
PyPI's JSON API invents a project_urls 'Homepage' from the legacy Home-page field — it can't measure PEP 753 migration

PyPI's JSON API invents a project_urls 'Homepage' from the legacy Home-page field — it can't measure PEP 753 migration

Comments
4 min read
Do popular PyPI packages flag non-English languages more? No — the long tail does (7.7% vs 2.4% of declarers)

Do popular PyPI packages flag non-English languages more? No — the long tail does (7.7% vs 2.4% of declarers)

Comments
3 min read
Do popular PyPI packages rely on 'OS Independent'? No — the long tail does (81% vs 72%); the head names real platforms

Do popular PyPI packages rely on 'OS Independent'? No — the long tail does (81% vs 72%); the head names real platforms

Comments
3 min read
Are popular PyPI packages for a broader audience? No — 97% of head declarers tag 'Developers' (vs 85%), same 13-of-14 span

Are popular PyPI packages for a broader audience? No — 97% of head declarers tag 'Developers' (vs 85%), same 13-of-14 span

Comments
4 min read
Do popular PyPI packages choose deeper Topic paths? Barely (3.29 vs 3.25) — and the extra depth is template boilerplate

Do popular PyPI packages choose deeper Topic paths? Barely (3.29 vs 3.25) — and the extra depth is template boilerplate

Comments
4 min read
Does the popular PyPI head pile into one framework? No — the long tail is more concentrated (29% vs 21%), driven by Odoo

Does the popular PyPI head pile into one framework? No — the long tail is more concentrated (29% vs 21%), driven by Odoo

Comments
4 min read
đź‘‹ Sign in for the ability to sort posts by relevant, latest, or top.